View Single Post
Old 12-05-2012, 05:44 PM   #112
FreshFRS
KCCO From Canada
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Asphalt FRS
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 424
Thanks: 160
Thanked 72 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bristecom View Post
Actually, I was thinking about this too. I think this would have done wonders for power and efficiency. The only downside is that it would probably cost a lot more than normal since you'd need 2 units as opposed to just one for an inline 4, and it would possibly lower reliability. I kind of wonder also if it makes the throttle response a little less predictable...

But yes, I would like to hear if Valvematic was considered and if so why it was rejected.
i think it would definitely add to the MSRP. but the reliability shouldn't be an issue its a very simple design, throttle response shouldn't be much different. my guess would be 230crank 170lb/ft (at 7400rpm redline) with valvematic, the ECU could be tuned (from the factory) to run as much timing as possible without knock. with 8500rpm who knows what kind of power it could make.
FreshFRS is offline