View Single Post
Old 12-02-2012, 05:13 AM   #27
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreshFRS View Post
true shorter exhaust runners means better spool. however, if i was to go turbo (which i doubt i will Rotrex C38-91 or Eaton TVS1320 FTW) i would do D3" using JDL's EL header. a custom intake (with about a 700hp Garret A/W intercooler core) so my piping route is only as long as it has to be for proper MAF readings and throttle skewed to the side for a fairly straight pipe. A fully water-cooled turbo (Comp CT3 5862) to avoid having to run oil lines.

More power from less boost would be better for our FA20 with sky high compression, no? Especially for us guys that can't run E-85. 94 is all i get here good gas but doesn't take timing like e-85 would.
If you have a good A/W intercooler you could possibly gain more efficiency by using gigantic intake cams to increase boost pressure but decrease dynamic compression. Higher manifold pressure means the intercooler sheds more heat and you get denser charge. Of course the supercharger power consumption has to be taken into account but I think at higher boost levels the cooler temperature should help more, especially with high compression ratio engine where the extra heat and pressure affects things more.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
FreshFRS (12-02-2012)