Quote:
Originally Posted by Tansey86
The graph and numbers are completely accurate, just the way this dyno labels things says flywheel instead of rwhp, bring it to a dynojet and it will make the same power.
Do you not believe crawfords numbers either? You think two reputable companies would fudge numbers just to get sales?
|
Again, DO THE MATH. Seriously did you read my post which had the math in it? I'm not trying to be an ass, but if you use the math you will see that it's not accurate.
I haven't checked Crawfords actually, but I will just for shits and giggles. AVO USA's numbers are accurate as I've stated open, at least they work with the mathmatical relationship between HP and TQ.
I only brought this up because I don't want members misled, nothing against AVO and I'm sure AVO USA can determine just how bogus the numbers are too by doing the math. I like their kit actually but I have to admit I get a lot more suspicious when I catch a vendor posting bogus graphs, see the issue with another vendor on here that went on for awhile.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles