View Single Post
Old 11-14-2012, 07:30 PM   #304
A5D5TRYR
Senior Member
 
A5D5TRYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: FR-S 6MT Ultramarine (BeeDrill)
Location: London, Canada
Posts: 238
Thanks: 104
Thanked 56 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchmaN View Post
We've made some dyno test up here in quebec with both and we had 5whp more with 94 on a stock car
Wow, so that suggests that on 91 this engine is pulling timing a bit to prevent knock/detonation. Interesting. I was wondering if 93 was really required or not but this makes me more inclined to run 94 over 91. Thanks for the info.
A5D5TRYR is offline   Reply With Quote