Quote:
Originally Posted by showbe
What this guy says does not make sense at all. He says changing things that are minor that improve the car would be pointless and would be better to just get another car. Yet when you get a new car you still would have to do those things again. Maybe not all since a new car might come with a turbo but your telling me that because you get a new car you wont have to do any of that? I would love for you to find me a car that has even half of that done that is stock, that is in the same price range. People are satisfied with the car it is not wrong to add the things he said because those things will not come with a stock car, Maybe some but 75% of the things he said wont, unless you pay a dealership mark up.
|
I settled with what you said earlier and thanked you, but if you are going to edit your post after that and rant me down, that's not cool- Very Disrespectful.
Make a new post next time (please) and then you can write whatever shit you want.
My connotation of improvements and your's are clearly different. There are steps you can take to improve the performance of your car. Then there are steps you can take to customize your car. When you say "find me a car that has even half of those that is stock," well you obviously would get this car for THAT reason. Did anyone buy this car because they liked the transmission, or the Boxer Engine, or the sheet metal, or the color, or the seats? No, you buy the set of those together... Liking only 25 percent of a car to buy it doesn't make sense IMO, because there is not enough bone on the meat of that to be even considered a working car. In school, 59 percent is a fail (depending on the subject), then looking at 25 percent... that definitely passes huh? You didn't even learn that in school.