View Single Post
Old 10-28-2012, 04:35 PM   #80
einzlr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: several
Location: norcal
Posts: 903
Thanks: 421
Thanked 286 Times in 223 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRiSson View Post
If you look at Fuelly, the web's largest collection of user-generated real-world MPG statistics, you will find the following:

  1. The FR-S gets roughly 10% better MPG than competitors running non-turbocharged 4-cylinder engines of roughly the same size. E.G.: GTI, C30.
  2. It gets MPG that is only about 10% worse than its most fuel-efficient competitors running engines of the same size. E.G.: Focus, Elantra, Rio, Cruze, Mazda3. But these engines offer less power.
  3. It gets roughly the same MPG as the historically most fuel-efficient hot-hatch, the Civic SI as well as the smaller, lighter MX-5 Miata.
That makes the FR-S fuel-efficient by almost any standard.
Thanks for compiling this information! There's a difference between EPA ratings, which are obtained systematically through a set of well-defined tests, and actual real-world experience. Anyone care to dig up the EPA numbers for the above cars? It would be interesting to compare.
__________________
Asphalt FR-S MT (future)
'05 Hyundai Accent; '01 BMW M Coupe; '01 BMW M Roadster (for sale); '99 BMW Z3 Coupe 2.8l (for sale)

"Simplicate and add lightness." - Gordon Hooton
einzlr is offline   Reply With Quote