View Single Post
Old 10-23-2012, 09:16 PM   #146
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,798
Thanks: 2,187
Thanked 4,243 Times in 2,221 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fistpoint View Post
I watched all of both videos(thanks for posting them), but there is nothing in them concerning features, it's all about the center of gravity and lowering the hood, suspension bragging, etc., etc.

I stand by my original statement: the 2013 Accord offers significantly more features and creature comforts for every dollar spent. The videos did nothing to challenge my point.
I guess it comes down to a definition of "features". To me, having:

- lowest cg in class
- horizontally-opposed boxer engine
- RWD
- limited-slip differential
- sport-tuned suspension
- high compression NA engine
- light weight
- neutral handling balance
- quick ratio steering
- good steering feel

...are all features you can't get in an Accord.

If you're making an argument about comfort features, what relevance does that have in a thread about a factory turbo?

DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DarkSunrise For This Useful Post:
chanomatik (10-23-2012), jonnyozero3 (10-23-2012)