View Single Post
Old 10-20-2012, 12:20 AM   #17
arghx7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: car
Location: cold
Posts: 599
Thanks: 72
Thanked 611 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik @ GBox View Post
I would have to agree the terminology used in differentials has lead many to believe that to adequately understand their operation requires some sort of mechanical engineering degree which, while helpful to have, certainly is not needed.

One of the main differences between the Salisbury differential and the Torsen, a bit simplified here so bear with me, would be the Torsen does not offer any lock up on the deceleration side of the differential.

This is a very useful feature of the Salisbury as it allow you to use the differential as a both a source of braking, as well as a component in stabilizing the car during breaking, as well.

Another difference would be most visible on the track under really aggressive driving. Should you actually lift one of the rear wheels the Torsen differential will for a moment send 100% of the power it is distributing to the wheel NOT on the ground. A plate type differential will still maintain drive to both (rear in this case) wheels. This can really make a difference in the handling characteristics and track behavior of the car.

This is why you will typically see the Salisbury style differentials in nearly all racing applications when the series rules allow for it.

I appreciate the comments keep them coming.

Erik Johnson
These comments only apply if you have traction and stability control off.
arghx7 is offline   Reply With Quote