View Single Post
Old 11-25-2009, 01:16 AM   #139
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chemist View Post
246bees, MatadorRacing_F1, how can you expect that kind of torque output from a 2.0L engine without using forced induction?


Torque, at most, will probably be around 160 ft-lbs. With your standard 7,000 RPM redline that at most amounts to ~213 hp.

However, estimates (rumors) have suggested 200 hp which, when combined with a standard 7,000 RPM redline, should give a solid 150 ft-lbs of torque.

Peak hp rarely comes at the same place as peak tq.

Really, I'm not expecting 180 ft-lbs, that'd be setting myself up for disappointment, as 180ft-lbs from a 2.0 engine that isn't NA or a diesel is pretty hard. I did say what would make me happy didn't I?

I do however expect at least 165ft-lbs, ~140-150 being the market standard and ++the compression ration w/ direct injection ought to net a pretty decent torque improvement.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote