View Single Post
Old 11-22-2009, 02:23 AM   #3
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,084
Thanks: 7,758
Thanked 19,315 Times in 8,410 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by scape View Post
i completely agree, and also possibly safer from less mass smashing into something..
i owned a slow, lumbering volvo 240; the doors slammed like some tank hatch closing, it had an iron bottom end, and nothing about it resounded with the words lightweight...it came in at 3000 lbs curb...i honestly don't know why new cars weigh so damn much, i find it hard to believe it all comes down to crumple zones and safety features tho; this car was and maybe still is one of the safest cars out there in that weight class...
Not only the safety, but I think most of em have better performance than older gen. Like stiffer chassis, lower center gravity, better traction and so on.
ex: Supra MKI vs Supra MKIV. R32 vs R35. S13 vs S15.
Those are just some examples.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote