View Single Post
Old 09-27-2012, 08:45 PM   #15
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post
There is a smog change in effect Jan 2013 so it's not that bad.

http://www.smogtips.com/new-smog-law-AB-2289.cfm

I really don't really know why you guys are bitching since you don't have to smog a new car for 5 yrs anyways.
Well that's bad and good at the same time (by the way, why did I need to pay for a smog test just 3 months before this new thing goes into effect? )...

On one hand there's less testing mandated, which is great. On the other hand, what matters for a car is tailpipe emissions, not some stupid visual check. All they need to do is modify the tests so that higher engine loads are taken into account, make the maximum allowed emissions stricter, and use a sniffer only. That way you can't pass if you have a turbo spewing out unburned gas and flames, and it'll make it really hard to pass without a cat as well, but gives leeway for modifications.

Tight 25mph constant speed (like how it is done now) emissions standards should be able to more or less ensure that your cats and O2 sensors are functioning well, and then a WOT run to say 5000rpm with slightly more lax allowances for HC/CO should be able to catch the people with smoke belching turbos but let most modifications go. As long as the modifications aren't polluting more than a slightly out of tune older car then that shouldn't be a big deal imo. Testing stations already have dynos and tailpipe sniffers, so what's the big deal?

Last edited by serialk11r; 09-28-2012 at 12:02 AM.
serialk11r is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
Tim_Asphalt_FRS (09-27-2012)