View Single Post
Old 09-24-2012, 07:43 PM   #3
mkaresh
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2003 Protege5
Location: United States
Posts: 40
Thanks: 3
Thanked 27 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by naikaidriver View Post

One thing I can definitely say about the FRS is that I will never again complain about the lack of power when driving this car the way it was built to be driven. The chassis sorts out bumps and elevation changes with ease and the stock rubber lets you know very early when the car is approaching its limits. The power-level on the car certainly keeps you out of trouble if you decide to get too agressive and when the rear does step out, its much more forgiving (if you're paying attention and don't overreact) than my old MR-2 turbo or BMW 325ci. Its light, responsive and not to mention elicited a LOT of looks out there!
Great pics. This paragraph is very similar to reviews I've written about the Mazda RX-8. Both cars are best once over 30, and on a good mountain road you're rarely under 30.

I'm going to have an FR-S for a week in mid-October (I do some reviewing), to meet up with my father in his RX-8 for some mountain driving. Very much looking forward to finding out how the two cars compare.

I already know which one gets better gas mileage...

By the way, did you have a portable nav system? I've only been the Dragon once, and got there after dark. Having a nav to know which turns were coming up made it much easier. That and I did my best to stay w/i 10 mph of the posted limit (35, quite disappointed to see that).
__________________
TrueDelta.com
Car reliability, fuel economy, price comparisons
mkaresh is offline   Reply With Quote