View Single Post
Old 09-23-2012, 04:08 PM   #51
Dadhawk
Senior Member
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 20,109
Thanks: 39,674
Thanked 25,440 Times in 11,602 Posts
Mentioned: 187 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miniata View Post
even if the calculations were that simple (they aren't) you're still adding at least 5 lbs with appropriately sized cables and a box to move a small bit of the weight balance to the rear when you could achieve the same effective result by using a 5-7 lb battery up front and also reduce the overall weight of the car.
It can make a huge difference, easily offsetting the weight of the cables. The battery in the car now sits relatively close to the COG, which means it has minimal impact on COG, at least the horizontal component.

If you move it further out on the rear ARM (moving it towards the rear of the car and further from the COG) the same weight gets amplified and move the the COG much more effectively. As someone above mentioned, its just like a see-saw (basic lever).

This is used in experimental aircraft all the time. you can offset a significant portion the weight of a 200lb engine just by putting the battery in end of the tail cone.
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.

Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S
Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark.
What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk".
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote