View Single Post
Old 05-23-2011, 12:31 PM   #483
Abflug
Senior Member
 
Abflug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: MR2
Location: Land des Quattro
Posts: 606
Thanks: 174
Thanked 50 Times in 28 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aki View Post
You cannot look to the LF-A mule as a sign/clue that the FR-S prototype can change much to production. Why? Because of a lot of reasons:

1) Development timeframe: the LF-A mule running around the ring in the first pic dates back to 2007, and was much earlier in the development process. That's 4 years before the car got released. If you tracked the LF-A development, you'd see that the design was basically locked down in 2009, about two years before its release. The FR-S is going to be released in a year. Can't completely overhaul the sheet metal without a very strong reason.

2) Speaking of strong reasons, whether the LF-A project would proceed hit a lot of stalls, setbacks and questions of when/whether it'd come out. In that timeframe it's not surprising changes would happen since the development situation was very fluid.

3) The cladding on the 2007 LF-A mule didn't look anywhere near production-ready. The FR-S running around looks pretty close to a production car.

Highly unlikely they're going to go back to the drawing board and release the Five-axis FR-S, if that's what you're hoping. Even the reps said the MKII concept was 90-95% of what you'd see in the production model.
^ Thatīs not the point I am talking about. Maybe you get me wrong!

That was just an example. But espacially for you, I show you an other one:

this is 2011 Opel Astra:


this is Opel Astra GTC 2011 MULE (picture is shot in March 2011):


(same car except for 3-door and 5-door model, but thatīs not the point)

Take a look at the rear lights! Get it?! and this is just an example for the rear lights...
Abflug is offline   Reply With Quote