Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunzite
But what's so wrong in asking for "the validation of chassis comparisons by using similar tires across the board"? (nice, succinct description, switchlanez).
Of course listing the tires would be mandatory for every car (because you need to know what tires were used). And obviously it's not the same if you start changing e.g. the suspensions or pretty much anything else (one of fatoni's BS claim). But he can't, or better said he refuses to understand that people are asking for a very specific thing which is meant to reduce variability (grip differences due to tires), and not add to it (random car changes). So he's repeating the same BS strawman each time people are asking for this specific thing.
All because "our way" would make the GT 86 to good for his liking.
switchlanez: Chris Harris is something... very passionate, a lot of feeling, I like watching him.
|
i refuse to understand that because i consider the tire a part of the suspension. i believe changing the suspension is changing the suspension. you can enjoy myopic thought process but consider just because you are asking for tires "specifically" it doesnt mean that it isnt any less arbitrary.
on a lighter note, i do find it funny how you accuse me of making this strawman fallacy and then in the next sentence talk about how i think tires would make the frs too good for my liking