View Single Post
Old 05-18-2011, 06:05 PM   #20
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCIONIZED View Post
My point is not so much an electric propulsion engine as it is hosepower. It sure would be nice to have the option say a gt frs model with more hp than a 2.0 boxer can give. Afetr all the the Ford Focus 2.0 echo boost puts out 250 hp. Do you really want a car that looks like a Ford "Focus" to be faster that an FR-S? That would be embarressing in my view.
If you're looking for a big power number, the FR-S/FT-86 is already off your radar. If you want power-per-dollar, you're likely drooling over getting a new Mustang 5.0 GT. $30,105 for 412HP is impressive @ $73/HP, with the V-6 Mustang and both engine Camaro's not far behind at about $75/HP.

There are plenty of cars out there that will be much quicker than the FR-S. Personally I'm not interested; let them be quicker. We're not buying a Bugatti Veyron here, we're buying a sexy coupe' version of a Miata. It's all about momentum, not power.

Now, if Toyota had the balls to come out with a turbo-Diesel FR-S, I'd be all over it! Ever since VW cancelled the Bluesport Roadster and Audi R4, I'm still waiting for someone to belly up and make a proper Diesel sports car. That's the current recipe for have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote