Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunzite
fantoni, I'd say you are trolling while not making sense. Otherwise, it would be impossible not to understand, with so many examples and explanations (last being DarkSunrise with an excellent example).
Talking about DarkSunrise's example: the "100% stock" FR-S did 0,88g on the skidpad and 67.3 mph slalom. Only by using the same or similar tires can we find out if the talk about balance and low CoG is real or BS. And guess what...
But you simply refuse to admit anything which could put the GT 86 in a good light.
By the way, who died and gave you the right to decide how one should compare cars? (i.e. either 100% stock, or free to change anything)
|
if my point is lost on you, it might not be because im not making sense. how does showing what a stock frs skid pad and slalom numbers support any part of your argument? i dont refuse to believe anything. i think that the frs is the coolest new car to come out since the elise. i dont hate the thing, i love it.
nobody gave me any rights. im just pointing out that you dont have them either. the problem is that we are complaining about reviews of stock vehicles because they arent changing the tires...thats not a stock comparison