View Single Post
Old 05-13-2011, 08:11 PM   #59
xantonin
Mr. Detail
 
xantonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: 2003 Celica GT-S
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 742
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxim View Post
That car already exists....it's called the MX-5 Miata.

Frankly, making a convertible out of a car designed with the goals stated for the FR-S makes as much sense as that horrific convertible Murano SUV that Nissan is offering.

It adds hundreds of pounds, increases complexity, decreases the already small truck volume, and has a profound effect on chassis rigidity, which FURTHER affects handling.

In short, buying a convertible (unless it was specifically engineered as one from the ground up, which eliminates those issues) is like marrying a woman without a vagina.

I promise, if Toyota somehow decides that making a convertible FR-S/FT-86 is a good idea, the Miata will eat it for lunch.
The Miata is a 2 seater. This car seats 4.
Most convertible technology has reached the point of not adding as much weight as they did in the past. Although complexity is surely a good point, I'm sure rigidity can be compensated for.

Either way, no one said it would be a better car. I just said it wouldn't mind having a convertible. I'd say Toyota could profit from it for appealing to a wider audience, but I'm sure the development and research would negate any possible market it could have attracted.
__________________
rar
xantonin is offline   Reply With Quote