05-02-2011, 06:49 PM
|
#110
|
|
Site Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by old greg
I see three possiblilites.
1) It'll be a destroked/bored FB like we were talking about, with slightly different heads. A 72mm stroke is a pipe dream though IMO, it won't be lower than the EJ20's 75mm stroke as Subaru is looking for higher torque/fuel economy.
On the plus side, they may want to stay away from the asymmetrical rods on their boosted engines which would keep stroke reasonable. ~80mm seems likely (ej25 = 79mm), and is plenty low for some very high rpms. Remember that the F20c had a stroke of 84mm and revved to 9000 rpm.
With the same deck height as an FB20, an 80mm stroke would allow 134.3mm rods. At 8000rpm that means a mean piston speed of 4200 ft/min and peak piston acceleration of 3718 g, which ought to be fairly reliable (compare that to 4724 ft/min and 4344 g for a normal FB20).
Figure a forged bottom end (that's just how Subaru rolls), probably a semi-closed deck, with forged pistons in the STi and cast in the WRX.
2) Something similar to #1 but with 2.5L, ~85mm stroke
3) They go for max. displacement. The FB kept the 113mm bore pitch of the EJ, which means that there should be enough room for a 99.5mm bore (EJ25). At 99.5mmx90mm we get a 2.8L engine. This doesn't seem all that likely with the CAFE deadline coming, but you never know.
|
Sorry, call me "jackass", "too damn picky" or whatever you want... but it's STI now and not STi anymore.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subaru_..._International
Sorry for off topic, but it really bugs me when I see that.
|
|
|