View Single Post
Old 12-29-2023, 03:48 PM   #35
blsfrs
Senior Member
 
blsfrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Drives: 2013 frs base
Location: central Virginia
Posts: 1,444
Thanks: 2,713
Thanked 1,459 Times in 688 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
IMO LCAs are overprescribed and generally not needed. Also nowhere near the level of engineering and testing (including millions and millions of miles of real-world street and track testing by we the customers) behind them vs. OEM. For probably 95% of these cars that are tracked, aftermarket LCAs are not much if any benefit and will almost certainly have a much shorter lifetime than stock.

I'm a structures engineer and IMO almost all aftermarket suspension offerings are a but suspect... When I needed to lengthen the lower front control arms on my 240Z I modified the factory arms myself rather than entrust my safety to adjustable aftermarket arms...
I went with Whiteline rear LCAs to get some adjustability. With my car lowered 1", the stock LCAs gave me around -3* camber and with the toe at 0" I was getting a lot of wear on the inside of my rear tires(17x9). My camber now is just under -2*. I would have like to have gotten it closer to -1* but I would need aftermarket toe arms.

The Whiteline quality looks pretty good. Nice powercoating. I probably need to invest in a pyrometer to check alignment rather than waiting for the tire to wear enough to see what is going on.
blsfrs is offline   Reply With Quote