Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0
The guy was a "Belgian Catholic priest, theoretical physicist, mathematician, astronomer, and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Louvain." I like him.
It wouldn't defy the law because earth is not a closed system. It is an open system receiving energy from the sun.
You started off as a single organism and became more organized, so do you defy the law of entropy?
The BBT cannot explain how a human eye came into existence because that theory explains the development of the universe. The Theory of Evolution explains how things evolve over time. The mechanism is reproduction, whether asexual or sexual reproduction, where genes are mixed and where mutations happen. Completely different theory.
We have living examples of eyes that reflect every intermediate between photosensitive skin to human/eagle eyes. It is actually one of the easiest things to demonstrate that is complex.
 |
Earth is a closed system; even Bill Nye the pseudoscience guy will tell you this.
Creation of a human does defy the "law" of entropy, as God is capable of doing anything; he made all living things, don't you know?
The golden ratio is everywhere in nature. It is clear evidence of an intelligent creator.
You keep proposing
theories, that defy the law of entropy, without including a creator, which would be impossible.
Obviously, the law of entropy had to be broken at some point, because you and I exist, as well as the natural things around us. A creator had to create all of these things in order for any of it to exist at all. All things people have studied, post creation, are subject to the law of entropy. The only explanation for the existence of anything at all, given this perceived law of entropy, is that an intelligent designer created it all.
Life doesn't create itself; a creator had to start everything off.