View Single Post
Old 09-06-2023, 01:53 PM   #24
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,590
Thanks: 1,378
Thanked 3,895 Times in 2,036 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ansix Auto View Post
While I do agree that 130C oil temps are tolerable with a high quality oil, it was just higher than we'd like to see. There's no magic threshold on what's acceptable or not. On the testing day, we were running 40minutes out of each hour. We want to be able to run our car non stop without cooling laps without concern.
Which do you consider worse: 130C (266F) indicated oil temp, stabilized and never going into runaway, or losing 30psi oil pressure at, what, 115C (240F)?

I've never thought an oil cooler was necessary, and the more I've looked into it the more I think the negatives outweigh the "positives" which are debatable... More cost, more weight, more potential failure points (leaks are common), and in some cases -30psi oil pressure? Damn...

You may know more than I but I've heard that the reported oil [edit]temperature to the canbus is a calculated, estimated "max", and 275F reported correlates to 255F sump temp which I think is what people have historically gone by for oil temps. I know that's the case with C6 Corvette, reported oil temp is calculated, and it doesn't go into "limp" mode until calculated/reported 160C (320F) oil temp!

I think there's a reason the FT86 goes all the way up to 340F, with 270F being at like 2/3 the range.

Last edited by ZDan; 09-06-2023 at 05:04 PM.
ZDan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
blsfrs (09-06-2023), ruturaj001 (09-06-2023)