View Single Post
Old 11-28-2022, 11:44 AM   #23
RedReplicant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: None
Location: Arizona
Posts: 960
Thanks: 1,533
Thanked 1,324 Times in 557 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Dugdale View Post
There are many advantages to choosing the RUCA over the RLCA. It seems unjust to penalize the 'Racer-X RUCA' for using a spherical joint when in fact the 'OEM RUCA' uses a spherical joint in the same location. From my perspective there are no engineering enhancements / changes or performance advantages / disadvantages in light of 'deflection' as they are both spherical type ball joints.

Definition of a ball joint as it relates to vehicles (per Wiki): "Ball joints are spherical bearings that connect the control arms to the steering knuckles, and are used on virtually every automobile made."

I don't happen to know of any other way one would properly affix a control arm to a steering knuckle besides the traditional spherical joint. I could justify the penalty if a urethane bushing is replaced by a spherical design joint, but not if an OEM spherical is replaced with.... another spherical.

Standing by for apr.
I don't disagree, I was thinking from a rules interpretation point of view.
RedReplicant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RedReplicant For This Useful Post:
Nick Dugdale (11-29-2022)