View Single Post
Old 09-16-2022, 02:23 PM   #4027
Spuds
The Dictater
 
Spuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,450
Thanks: 26,178
Thanked 12,461 Times in 6,164 Posts
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Really there is little reason to take a tank to any fight anymore.
They started out as a way to break through well established lines, then they became a way to get heavy ordinance close enough to the battle to make a difference now they are pretty much useful for nothing but fighting other tanks.
The development of light antitank weapons' and missile/rocket carrying drones or aircraft that can destroy them from miles away make them sitting ducks in today's battlefield. They simply no longer have any tactical value at all.

EDIT: I will amend that statement a bit. They still have value in a psychological sort of way as they are big, noisy and intimating but as an effective weapon system they are past their prime.
In general:
-The greater the range/timespan of kinetic engagement, the more countermeasures can be brought to bear before impact and the more effective they are.
-The greater the complexity of the engagement the more vulnerabilities it has, and more elements that can just go wrong.
-Long range fires don't take, secure, and hold ground.
Spuds is offline   Reply With Quote