Quote:
Originally Posted by Dadhawk
Understood, that's basically what I said, it's not "or" it's an "and".
You could take either out of the equation and the net change is still up, but not as much.
|
My point is that it isn't even an "And". The increase is anthropomorphic. The year over year addition is not at historical natural levels, as you can see. There is more of an exponential rise recently that coincides and is best explained by anthropomorphic causes, which is why I am saying it isn't an "And"; it is 99% anthropomorphic (made up percentage used to illustrate the difference between human and natural rise).
