Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan
If you want to address me, don't say "you 2".
Where did I cite an article saying that?
Obviously methods for determining temperatures prior to the 20th century are going to require different methods...
Scientists seeking the truth, who succeed or fail based on how right they are, are a lot more trustworthy than hacks given $$$ by fossil fuel industry, who reliably get paid specifically to spread bad info...
|
You liked Irace's comments, so I take it as you affirm his arguments.
I'm not even gonna comment on your post about crude industry lobbying and the wars that started as a result. That's Tcoat's department.
No hard feelings buddy! I don't treat you as an enemy. If I visit your area any time, I'll be happy to stop by and we'll have a drink together.
This is where I'm coming from: Science doesn't stand alone by itself. Reason and Logic are key to its existence. I can't blindly believe in anything labelled as "science". If it doesn't stand the test of logic, it's just another opinion to me. Especially there is a huge fallacy that surfaced up in modern scientific community these days: "Experts say...". Modern scientific communities to a great extent are void of critical questioning.