Quote:
Originally Posted by allenframi
This has been covered in many threads, but I have specific questions that I have not found by searching. So here goes. No flaming plz.
Boosting has obvious benefits in power, but the FA20 engine seems prone to issues when boosting—too much anyway.
My question… is it more reliable to focus on N/A gains? There appears to be a lot of mods that can be done to provide reasonable gains. Would it be more stable?
I've read that the "built" engines, unless by extremely reputable shops are often unreliable, however I am curious about DDs not track cars for the purpose of this thread.
For almost the same $$ as boosting, if you did headers, power blocks, throttle control or OFT, and the like couldn't you have solid gains and a measure of reliability?
This is vague, open-ended, and probably naive, but I wanted to get some real info in one thread. Again, flaming me does not add to the conversation. I'm fairly new to the car and learning as I go. So…
Better to boost or build up N/A power?Boost vs N/A - questions
|
If you're not going to track, and stay strictly to DD, stay NA.
Items in bold you don't really need (Power blocks, throttle controllers).
Headers, E85, good set of tires, coilovers, and a good tune (OFT/ECUTek) is all you'll need.
Like others have mentioned, adding boost comes with risk, and is one you have to keep on the back of your mind always, in case your rods decide to play a rendition to "Knocking on heaven's door". There are measures you can take to mitigate it, like installing good supporting mods, but the risk is still there.