View Single Post
Old 04-11-2022, 03:03 AM   #249
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,383
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dadhawk View Post
It's not cost efficient, at least for us. I paid $11,000 for the 2004 Suburban in 2012. During that time, it's had about $3,000 in standard and emergency maintenance.

We have made this, and similar week long trips, off the top of my head, 60 times during that 10 years. I also use it at least every other weekend to haul something from somewhere to somewhere else that would not fit in our Mustang or the 86.

Factor in the time eaten up dealing with rental agencies, worrying about dings and dents, etc (or paying the extra fees) I think I'm doing OK.
Um, that’s one way to put words in my mouth I suppose.

I average about one-two instances per year where I need something larger then a 86/sedan/hatch this includes moving house several times over the past 15 years, week long trips, moving 2-5 people (I did LA to SF with three people in my 86 once, took 4 people to Thunderhill), helping other people move, no idea how many times I’ve tossed my bike in the back of my 86 etc.

Hope you got the six disc cd changer in the Burban.




I’m lucky I can borrow a 4-door f150 truck in the family, even with super easy and free access (i have a set of keys to it, it’s 25 minutes from my work) I don’t use it more then 1-2x per year.

And wagons are the way, I would never need a truck except for moving homes if I had a quality full sized station wagon.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly

Last edited by strat61caster; 04-11-2022 at 03:30 AM.
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post:
Dadhawk (04-11-2022)