View Single Post
Old 01-13-2022, 01:06 PM   #43
gpshumway
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2007 WRX
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spuds View Post
So you are comparing aftermarket control arms to OEM steering knuckles?
I'm comparing OEM control arms to OEM steering knuckles. The 2006 WRX came with aluminum control arms. Is it possible that Karen had installed say Mevotech arms in place of the Subaru ones and it escaped my memory? Sure, it's possible. I'm saying that people who've used their Subarus hard in the past have had durability issues with OEM parts. (5x100 hubs anyone?) They don't have the huge safety margins we imagine, especially when used for track/autocross duty.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Spuds View Post
And no, static and dynamic forces and their effects on materials are quite well understood. The difference is whether the maker of the part decided to spend time actually doing the math rather than slapping some parts together and saying it's good.

OEMs are not exempt from slapping parts together. The twins are quite obviously a frankenstein of parts-bin components. And the standard modeling they engage in may not include things like R-comp tires. As an example, take a look at 949 racings' discussion of wheel strength and racetrack use. (LINK) For a historical example, consider the suspension mounts on an E46 M3.


Like I said in my original post, given the history of OEM parts used for track duty, and the prevalence of such duty for 86 twins, some slight concern is warranted. The aluminum knuckles should at least be given special attention during pre-track tech inspections.
gpshumway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gpshumway For This Useful Post:
Ohio Enthusiast (01-13-2022), Spuds (01-13-2022)