Quote:
Originally Posted by PulsarBeeerz
I don't buy that this dyno reads 14% lower than a Dynojet either. Mustang dynos read whatever the operator wants..That tuned Gen1 would be making over 200whp on pump gas if that was the case and the Gen2 245whp which doesn't happen on Dynojets... It reads like a Mustang dyno calibrated to deliver result similar to a Dynojet with SAE correction factor.
|
The dyno does not read what the operator wants. There is no way to skew the result or scale it using the holeshot software we use. The only thing you can do is skew the load loss calibration by running it in gear for adding to the drivetrain drag. However this was not the case. Both cars were run on the same day using the same prep process without any scaling.
Yes the turbo FRS was done in the summer with warmer temperature and yes it wasn't the strongest performer especially given our fuel quality. IF SAE correction was applied you would see a bigger gap but I left the numbers uncorrected on all vehicles. What you are seeing there is how knock resistance can really come into play when you have a high compression motor and add boost to it without having enough octane. Higher octane would have made a significant difference in that case.