View Single Post
Old 10-20-2021, 11:03 PM   #100
Blighty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: WR Blue Pearl 2022 Subaru BRZ
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 818
Thanks: 790
Thanked 518 Times in 275 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
Not sure what is the classic sports car formula that other car manufacturers don't have nowadays. Maybe cars like the 86/BRZ and the MX-5 belong to the entry level sports car category while others play higher?

If that's the case, then the S2000 was considered already by its introduction a level up comparing to the MX-5. Here is a review article of related cars back in '03 :

Nissan 350Z: $30,000
Honda S2000: $33,060
Audi TT: $39,660
BMW Z4 3.0: $40,945
Porsche Boxster: $43,365

The base price of a MX-5 was $22,363 at that time. A S2000 was closer in price to an Audi TT or a BMW Z4 than a MX-5. Same can be said about performance figures like quarter-to-mile from standstill at that time

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...parison-tests/
I guess those prices are a good point of reference, the twins have pricing also taken from sports cars 20 years ago

Yes, the s2000 was a bit more of premium, around 50k in todays money. There was also the Nissan Silvia 240sx, MR2 and a few others around the same mark as the MX5. Then you have the FWD cars like the Renaultsport clio, the celica, corolla sportivo (matrix in NA) and a few others.
Blighty is offline   Reply With Quote