Thread: Runflats
View Single Post
Old 09-29-2021, 09:33 PM   #6
soundman98
ProCrastinationConsultant
 
soundman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: '14 Ranger, '18 Tacoma 4Dr LB
Location: chicago-ish
Posts: 11,330
Thanks: 35,240
Thanked 13,676 Times in 6,782 Posts
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by extrashaky View Post
So you have specific experience with runflats on your 86? Please tell me more about that.
give me a break. runflats came on a ton of other cars, mostly GM vehicles. it doesn't matter which other vehicle the rubber rolled under, the conditions will be the same. a tire is a bladder of air, mounted to a round hunk of metal, that rolls. the tech of the tire might be more specific, but there are no tires in the entire world that would act in an entirely different way when installed on 2 different vehicles. the characteristics of runflats are well known at this point.

the only benefit to a run-flat over a normal tire is that they can be driven on to a safe-er location instead of just simply shredding in seconds on deflation.

runflat's never really caught on because the overall expense per tire is a lot more, availability is iffy at best on a normal day, and the theoretical 'convienience' isn't significantly improved over a 5-tire, or 4-tire/fix-a-flat setup.

runflat's have their origins in military applications, where teams needed to GTFO of a bad situation, and the vehicles were taking on tire damage. runflats allowed them to actually GTFO, where a standard tire would strand them within range of the opposition.

runflat's aren't going to help during cleanup after a hurricane, but will help during evacuating if you just need to get a few more miles to safety.
__________________
"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time"
soundman98 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to soundman98 For This Useful Post:
x808drifter (09-30-2021)