View Single Post
Old 08-29-2021, 11:22 AM   #15
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,335
Thanks: 698
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundman98 View Post
imo, spokes should follow lug count. 5 spokes for 5 lugs 6 spokes on 5 lugs irritates my ocd. 1 can be centered up, but the rest are always going to look 'off' once they're on a rolling car.
It's nice to have spokes mach lug nut count, but imho more so for strength/weight. As in holes for lugs can be positioned exactly where already extra material of spokes already is, and thus is not needed to be added, where lug is placed off root of spoke. Looks wise .. not enough to trigger my OCD. I use mostly two set of wheels, both are similar design (6-thin straight spoke) and obviously of twin's 5x100 PCD (for summer-track:17x7.5 Taneisya T6, for winter:16x7 SSR Type-C), not seeing "non-maching" a visual issue. As for wheel design itself, subjectively 6-spoke looks better to my eye then 5-spoke .. spokes itself seem, somewhat more symmetrical / better fitting on car.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to churchx For This Useful Post:
soundman98 (08-29-2021)