View Single Post
Old 07-01-2021, 03:12 AM   #93
Jordanwolf
Rice King
 
Jordanwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: '19 FWD master race CTR
Location: The land of the North
Posts: 2,890
Thanks: 1,079
Thanked 2,002 Times in 1,204 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
This looks more like a fastback sedan than a hatchback. It doesn’t work for me. Maybe it is because it is a compact. The Accord, the Audi A5 Sportback or A7, Mercedes sedans, etc all work for me. This, the Kia Stinger and some others don’t work. I would get the standard sedan, even if the hatch has more utility. Actually, I would probably get the Accord 2.0T sport, if I wanted a Honda sedan.
The backend is the only saving grace of this car. They are trying to use reverse psychology this time around. People were too polarized by last gen rear end, so they tried their hardest, but then looked at the front and went "why not make it a budget looking Accord? Brilliant. Don't forget to add some weird proportions and we're good to go".

And in with all the journalists: "The new Civic looks great now, toned down, more bland, more mature, I'm still not going to buy one though because I'm probably going to buy an Accord, an actual *adult* vehicle". So why not aim it at the younger generations ???¿¿¿¿???¿¿ The K5 looks great and has a radical design for example, front end at least, rear not bad.
__________________
Glorious Honda.
Know my 5x120 GREATNESS PEASANTS.
Jordanwolf is offline   Reply With Quote