View Single Post
Old 07-28-2012, 10:59 AM   #25
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opposed View Post
Pulley's should not "show" any gains on a dyno. He has pictures of the pulley, header, and crosspipe weights stock vs AP components.
Reduced rotating mass WILL show gains on acceleration pulls.

For a better picture of what the over-pipe and header are gaining, they should have dyno'd them after the cat-back, then added the pulley after. So we still don't know out of the second gains how much is from reduced rotating mass cutting losses and how much is the header and overpipe making power. However in June they said they saw 6-7 from the header, but no graph at the time.

I don't think we'll get any better than this from them.

It's sad that it's been dragged out to 4 threads, when all it would've taken was a "Holy shit we forgot the flywheel and pulley were still on!!! Pull the dynosheet and edit the first page!" when I brought up the potential in the first thread.

Be more careful in the future.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dimman For This Useful Post:
jedibow (07-28-2012), SkullWorks (07-30-2012)