View Single Post
Old 05-14-2021, 02:33 PM   #33
Tokay444
Anti stance.
 
Tokay444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,636
Thanks: 903
Thanked 962 Times in 550 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
I don't think you can have a lower COG with engines other than a boxer. It not only about how much low or high the engine sits in the bay. It is about the overall height of the engine and of not being top heavy. The main advantage of a K24 swap would be its higher power output and lower weight, so you would have also a bit better front to rear weight distribution with the expense of a bit worse COG. I believe K24 weights around 413 lbs. (including transmission), while FA20 is in the range of 480 lbs.
The engine can have a cog on the oil pan. If you mount it on the roof, what good does that part specific cog do you?
Yes, the cars have a low cog. No, it's not specifically because of the Boxer engine.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tokay444 For This Useful Post:
ZDan (05-14-2021)