Alright @
Irace86.2.0, lets start over. I'm first going to present a summary of one logical argument in favor of people adopting veganism.
1. Causing unnecessary suffering is amoral.
2. Cruelty to animals causes unnecessary suffering of the animal.
3. Factory meat farms are cruel to animals.
4. Factory meat farms exist because the large demand for meat.
5. Vegans do not add to the demand for meat.
6. Veganism(?) is a morally responsible method of nourishment.
Now, allow me to present a straw man argument.
1. Causing unnecessary suffering is amoral.
2. Cruelty to animals causes unnecessary suffering of the animal.
3. It is cruel to make dogs fight each other for entertainment.
4. The people who engage in dog fighting activities (not air combat) are engaging in an amoral activity.
5. Eating meat is also engaging in an amoral activity.
I can follow the first thread of thinking. I can also argue against each point in that if I choose to. The video basically started with the second thread of thinking. The reason it is a straw man argument is that it links 2 different contexts that have the same root of thought, but circumvents a number of difficult arguments in the first thread with perceptively easier arguments in the other thread. That jump from 4 to 5 has no substance that can be argued.