View Single Post
Old 03-30-2021, 05:49 PM   #1150
Opie
Senior Member
 
Opie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2020 GMC Canyon Denali Diesel
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,997
Thanks: 1,651
Thanked 2,400 Times in 1,026 Posts
Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfwaxsmitty View Post
Comparing percentages for individual risks of a vaccine vs Covid doesn't account for transmissibility. If a person has a reaction to the vaccine, that only affects them. If they get Covid and transmit it to another person, or 20 others, now there are many people facing the risks and effects of Covid, and they may also then infect others.

Regarding the national response to a pandemic, how would anyone expect all the answers from day 1? The most natural course would involve gaining insight over time and thus modifying our response. What doesn't help is when extreme measures are taken to obstruct the process of learning and improving the efficacy of our response as a nation.
A person getting the vaccine incorrectly assumes they are safe. The truth is no one knows how long the antibodies created via vaccine (or by actually contracting Covid) last. And even if vaccinated, you can carry the virus and still transmit it to others, just like those who aren't vaccinated.

"Several recent studies suggest that both natural and vaccine-induced immunity to Covid-19 is robust at least for the medium term, and even those hinting at possible reinfections suggest it is a rare phenomenon mainly afflicting people with severely weakened immune systems.

Fauci nonetheless maintains that reinfections, particularly from the South African variant of the virus, are not only commonplace but justify maintaining a suite of restrictive nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPI) such as lockdowns, mask mandates, and social distancing regulations – perhaps even for another year.

A Danish study that Fauci referenced to justify this assertion made no such claim about reinfection being widespread. Quite the contrary, its authors concluded “that protection against repeat SARS-CoV-2 infection is robust and detectable in the majority of individuals, protecting 80% or more of the naturally infected population who are younger than 65 years against reinfections.”

They did further observe “that individuals aged 65 years and older had less than 50% protection against repeat SARS-CoV-2 infection” and recommended targeted vaccinations for this group to bolster immunity. But even this finding came with several acknowledged limitations, as the study was not designed to test for repeat infection among the vast number of mild or asymptomatic cases of the disease, or to directly verify whether suspected reinfection cases were the result of misclassified lingering infections.

The study did not, however, support Fauci’s contention that reinfections are becoming commonplace."

Source: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...575-4/fulltext
__________________
2020 GMC Canyon Denali Duramax, 2021 Forester Sport, 2000 Subaru Legacy B4 RSK 5MT (JDM Import) and random 86 chassis rebuilds....
Opie is offline