View Single Post
Old 03-30-2021, 04:58 PM   #1146
surfwaxsmitty
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: '14 BRZ 6MT
Location: NO, LA
Posts: 90
Thanks: 125
Thanked 63 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie View Post
What made this worse wasn't ignorance by a previous administration. It was, and is because of the constant, incoherent changing of information by our so-called expert on infectious diseases that has back tracked, changed direction and contradicted himself so many times no one know who to trust. Less intrusive approaches to virus prevention were adopted by other areas and had similar, if not better, infection rates.

The science says the virus is survivable by 99.x% of the population, and current reports from the CDC say the Covid vaccine appears to be safe for 99.x% of the population. I have an equal chance of dying from either.

See the data yourself on deaths related to Covid vaccines since January 2021 here.
Source: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
Comparing percentages for individual risks of a vaccine vs Covid doesn't account for transmissibility. If a person has a reaction to the vaccine, that only affects them. If they get Covid and transmit it to another person, or 20 others, now there are many people facing the risks and effects of Covid, and they may also then infect others.

Regarding the national response to a pandemic, how would anyone expect all the answers from day 1? The most natural course would involve gaining insight over time and thus modifying our response. What doesn't help is when extreme measures are taken to obstruct the process of learning and improving the efficacy of our response as a nation.

Last edited by surfwaxsmitty; 03-30-2021 at 05:09 PM.
surfwaxsmitty is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to surfwaxsmitty For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (03-30-2021), Ultramaroon (03-30-2021)