Quote:
Originally Posted by cyde01
of course, you ignored the perfectly good point i made that the subaru engine has inherent engineering advantages. branding it a scion doesn't.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tranzformer
Mute point here.
|
Moot point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyde01
i really don't see how you can draw that conclusion from my posts.
just because i think subaru makes good engines doesn't mean i think that toyota can't. look at the 1LR-GUE, possibly the best production N/A engine ever.
i am also a toyota guy and like toyota engines, but i'm not enough of a brand whore to not be able to recognize the upsides of a subaru boxer. i think the motor has potential to be really good but we won't know until the car comes out.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyde01
manufacturers paying shops lots of money to make a rwd version of an FF for drift competition is faking the funk.  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonitti
The car is FWD, when you are pushing 1200hp to the front wheels, you tell me what methods you would have utilized to put the power down to the ground? I'm waiting for your expertise on the subject matter. Please include your rich racing background as well as your advanced study credentials in Aerodynamics.
|
Perhaps used a rwd or awd car to begin with?
Rado's TC is stupid fast and well developed, granted. Know that full well. However, Put that much time, budget and work into a respectable rwd chassis and see if it doesn't turn out better.. without the park bench on the front. I like unconventional thinking, however what's the point in reinventing the wheel and making it octagon because round is too passe?
**edit**
wow. 24 pages in a day and a half? Must be some sort of record. lmao