Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally86
It's definitely weird. The article flat out says they tested it on 42k people with no issues but intentionally avoided testing people who've had issues with allergic reactions to vaccines.
|
Sure, but people with a "history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food" having reactions to the vaccine is not surprising to me. The testing phases of these things were absolutely rushed but the findings are consistent. Should we be more or less skeptical with this new information? I personally think its ab the same.