View Single Post
Old 10-14-2020, 01:30 PM   #14
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,012 Times in 2,098 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrowsFeast View Post
It seems you and I have had significantly different experiences with braking setups. I'm starting to be suspicious it's the S2000's fault!
Ha! Kinda impossible tho, no way with the same car, brake pads, and tires that the S2k coulda somehow thrown more heat at ATE200 fluid vs. off-the-shelf DOT4!

That was my one foray into "specialized" brake fluid. IMO it's overprescribed and overused and in most cases for tracked cars, totally unnecessary.

Quote:
Still, I wouldn't say no to name brand dot 4/5.1. Motul stuff is too expensive for my tastes. 2-3x as much as ATE200 where I've looked.
My approach is, as long as off-the-shelf DOT4 or DOT5.1 continue to work well with no discernable negatives, why bother with harder to get and way more pricey fluids? I think a lot of folks assume that ATE200, RBF600, etc. are just "better", but I don't know if that's even true. I think people just look at published wet/dry boiling points and assume higher number = always "better". But if they degrade and become more compressible under multiple heating cycles like the AT200 did in my case, that's not "better"...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote