View Single Post
Old 06-06-2020, 01:20 PM   #1225
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
The problem is mainly the boxer design which is not the best option for fuel consumption and emission standards. Porsche on the other hand has the advantage of providing figures combined with the ones of VW's group. In general, not very easy days for Subaru if they don't move to a bigger integration with Toyota.
What makes the boxer so bad? They are heavier than a straight four, but if that was such a problem then everyone with a V6 would be switching to straight sixes. It is probably more like Subaru wasn’t advancing fuel economy with hybrids and high compression engines. The EJ was a short stroke performance engine. They were late to the emissions game with the FB/FA with direct injection, high compression, and they were late to the game with valve timing.

Look at average mpgs when Subaru switched to CVTs. Subaru has more of a weight problem offering AWD as standard than an engine problem. That, and they only offer one car as a hybrid and more cars with a manual than most.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post:
Spuds (06-08-2020)