View Single Post
Old 06-03-2020, 05:35 PM   #23
mrg666
pessimistic skeptic
 
mrg666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: '14 FR-S Monogram AT JRSC
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,773
Thanks: 1,699
Thanked 1,042 Times in 687 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 View Post
Which one gets better MPG at partial throttle, low load/cruising?
Which one makes more WHP at the same crank horsepower?
Which one makes more WHP at less boost pressure?

See answer to these trivia questions below.

Turbo
No other FI option gets better MPG then JRSC. Never seen any turbo kit better than the stock NA engine in gas mileage where JRSC is actually better. on my car.

Nobody measured/posted crank horsepower here.

I think JRSC makes ~260 WHP at 9psi. Is there anything better at 9psi?

All of the "turbo is best" arguments are based on low rpm torque which people think increases driving fun. And, this is funny, most of them drive manual but too lazy for downshifting.

Turbo literally kills the spirit of this car and blows up the engine.
mrg666 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mrg666 For This Useful Post:
Teseo (05-15-2023)