View Single Post
Old 04-22-2020, 01:20 PM   #66
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,947 Times in 1,263 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PulsarBeeerz View Post
These are avg runs I got from virtual dyno. Yeah I know virtual dyno, but its better than an opinion with no substance behind it right? Same stretch of road, full tank of E85, HKS catless header, Greddy snorkel scoop, drop in Blitz filter, Mishimoto intake tube, 2.75" overfront pipe, Perrin catback and SAE corrected for weather conditions of that day. The numbers aren't as important as the trend from the runs of course. When I graphed raw MAFv it came out just like below as well.







I don't feel a MY17 IM by its self is worth it past looks. However if you are willing to go a step farther it is certainly worth it.
A 2mm bored over OEM TB is only $160 via Maxbore. My IM was port matched to the TB exit of course. The expensive step is the extrude honing at $550+.
Nah.. Virtual dyno has an issue with the SAE correction. It is BS for our cars. I have used it already. The reason you get the 199 whp compared to the other 2 runs is the better intake temperature (65 vs 85 F ) and not the bored TB. I have a 67mm TB too and it is basically for better response. Try next time to make runs with same conditions or even better use a conventional dyno.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote