Quote:
Originally Posted by flyboy2160
LOLOL From worse than an armchair expert working at McDs, from an unemployed expert (=engineer who had a brief college internship at GM) who reads too many detective novels and who tries to figure out the plot:
If the ramp up is slow and cash flow is tight, why will they spend money to replace the Twins line? Wouldn't they save short-term money by just letting that line sit idle or by just not building the Twins on it if the line a flexible one?
Where did your data originally come from?
Couldn't you make a case that hard-core car enthusiasts are more likely to buy than struggling people just using their cars as appliances?
Thanks.
|
That is what I said.
I explained where my data came from.
Yes the hard core may be willing to spend but what they will spend on are the low volume, low profit cars. It is a poor way to try to get cash flowing again. These cars can sit on the lot for prolonged periods at the best of times.