Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat
We dealing with facts or circumstantial evidence?
He was stunt driving and was caught.
Pot is legal here he just happened to have it in the wrong spot.
The ticket was issued in conjunction the same as any other one would.
Assuming he was impaired is not a fact as you have stated.
There is zero indication he was charged with impaired so if the pot was in his cupholder, glove box or anyplace but the trunk doesn't make him dumber just for having it in the car while speeding.
Doing over twice the limit makes him dumb.
|
Simply saying pot is legal doesn't mean it's legal in all circumstances. That's like saying alcohol is legal so you can drink while driving or have an open container in the car. Just like alcohol, there are circumstances where having or smoking weed is illegal, such as when you're driving, much less doing 160+.