View Single Post
Old 04-21-2020, 12:59 PM   #19
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkSunrise View Post
It's much closer to an open container/bottle charge than a tinted window or front plate violation. It factors in precisely because the guy was going 160+ mph on public roads.

I'll put it this way. If a guy arrived to a track day with a bag of weed or alcohol in his cupholder, I absolutely would not run in the same group or session as him. It may not have been proven that he's high or drunk, but certainly the risk is there and moreover there is circumstantial evidence that he is or is intending to be. And that's just with a track day in a controlled setting! The danger is much higher with some random guy deciding he wants to go 160+ on public roads.
We dealing with facts or circumstantial evidence?
He was stunt driving and was caught.
Pot is legal here he just happened to have it in the wrong spot.
The ticket was issued in conjunction the same as any other one would.
Assuming he was impaired is not a fact as you have stated.
There is zero indication he was charged with impaired so if the pot was in his cupholder, glove box or anyplace but the trunk doesn't make him dumber just for having it in the car while speeding.
Doing over twice the limit makes him dumb.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote