View Single Post
Old 04-11-2020, 12:11 AM   #6
grumpysnapper
Senior Member
 
grumpysnapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Drives: BRZ
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 352
Thanks: 309
Thanked 608 Times in 209 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
I would bet that the performance advantage from the "weight savings" is very close to zero....

For structurally critical parts, I tend to stick with OEM unless there's a very compelling reason otherwise and the alternative design has been proven out with a LOT of street and track miles... OEM parts generally have orders of magnitude more real-world testing done on them.

Also in the event of a big hit, a mild-steel part that yields and bends may be safer than a welded 4130 chrome-moly part that might fracture/break.
Thanks mate, I agree with you about the the robustness of OEM components (generally), and have basically continued to use primarily OE suspension except for dampers and springs.

I guess I've been quite anal about weight, particularly when it comes to unsprung or "partly" sprung.

What has been a little frustrating is that many of the gains I had made in the rear, have to certain extent been negated by a couple of recent upgrades ( HD drive shafts, and custom rear dampers)...which have added ability with the cost of weight.

Hence, 4 kg's less, of moving suspension mass is worth while to me. If it were fully sprung, I would tend to agree with you on cost v benefit.

Lyndon
grumpysnapper is offline   Reply With Quote