View Single Post
Old 02-03-2020, 04:26 PM   #31
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROFL it's Waffle View Post
I'd agree more HP is not the answer with 295 ft-lbs at 0 rpm on tap.
Power-to-weight ratios are awfully focused on HP. I think it becomes more impressive if it changed to torque-to-weight ratio.
Power to weight gives you a good idea of acceleration performance. Torque to weight by itself tells you nothing... Massive torque at very low rpm will not accelerate quickly...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
ROFL it's Waffle (02-04-2020), Tcoat (02-03-2020)